Sci-Phi: Journal of Science, Philosophy & Dialectical Inquiry e-ISSN: 3023-8914 • Vol. 2026, Issue 1, pp. 277–282 (e20260024)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.sciphi.2026.0024 Open Access (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International (Diamond Open Access))
The Simulation Structure of Time and Neuronal Time Perception
Yazar (Author):Emre Pelit
• ORCID:0009-0000-8391-4210
• E-posta: emrepelit39@gmail.com Kurum (Affiliation): Sci-Phi: Bilim ve Felsefe Araştırmaları Enstitüsü (Institute of Science, Philosophy & Dialectical Inquiry) Yayın Tarihi (Published):
• Kelime Sayısı: 450 kelime
• Sınıflandırma: Fizik & Kozmoloji (physics.hist-ph; gr-qc; quant-ph)
Öz / Yönetici Özeti — Makalenin Ana Tezi (Abstract & Core Thesis)
Yet, proceeding from the DeWitt equations, we can state that there is timelessness at the quantum scale. Since larger-scale entities have time-dependent conditions of existence, and given that the Theory of Relativity is already established, we cannot claim that any entity's unique temporal conditions overlap exactly with those of another. Therefore, whether any living being actually lives longer than another in real terms remains unknown. For example, we cannot definitively say that a child who passes away at 3 years old remained alive for a shorter duration than a man who lived to be 100. Because we do not know what the perception of time actually depends on. This alone is glaringly sufficient to prove the existence of the Creator, because as I mentioned, this world is merely the frontend of a computer environment. Behind it lies a backend consisting of a vast multitude of code blocks.
1. Tez (Thesis — Başlangıç Önermesi): Dear readers, as most of us know, in the DeWitt equations, there is a non-existence of time at the quantum level. But has it ever occurred to you: what organ or entity actually imposes the concept of time upon us—is it our mind, a quantum particle within our neurons, or our soul?
2. Antitez (Antithesis — Diyalektik Gerilim & Karşı-Sorgulama): Can we not conclude from this that humans and other living or non-living entities are far more complex than we think? What I am trying to say is, since timelessness at the quantum scale is demonstrated, if we do not even know what plays an active role in the time-axis existence of larger entities, couldn't we deduce that we are part of a greater whole? In other words, could we not find evidence for the existence of God in this way? We know that the notion of time is not merely the subjective time of a single individual; in reality, the phenomenon we call time is a parameter valid for every entity.
3. Sentez (Synthesis — Aufhebung & Üst Çözümleme): Yet, proceeding from the DeWitt equations, we can state that there is timelessness at the quantum scale. Since larger-scale entities have time-dependent conditions of existence, and given that the Theory of Relativity is already established, we cannot claim that any entity's unique temporal conditions overlap exactly with those of another. Therefore, whether any living being actually lives longer than another in real terms remains unknown. For example, we cannot definitively say that a child who passes away at 3 years old remained alive for a shorter duration than a man who lived to be 100. Because we do not know what the perception of time actually depends on.
This alone is glaringly sufficient to prove the existence of the Creator, because as I mentioned, this world is merely the frontend of a computer environment. Behind it lies a backend consisting of a vast multitude of code blocks.
Tam Metin İnceleme (Full-Text Article)
Dear readers, as most of us know, in the DeWitt equations, there is a non-existence of time at the quantum level. But has it ever occurred to you: what organ or entity actually imposes the concept of time upon us—is it our mind, a quantum particle within our neurons, or our soul?
Can we not conclude from this that humans and other living or non-living entities are far more complex than we think? What I am trying to say is, since timelessness at the quantum scale is demonstrated, if we do not even know what plays an active role in the time-axis existence of larger entities, couldn't we deduce that we are part of a greater whole? In other words, could we not find evidence for the existence of God in this way? We know that the notion of time is not merely the subjective time of a single individual; in reality, the phenomenon we call time is a parameter valid for every entity.
Yet, proceeding from the DeWitt equations, we can state that there is timelessness at the quantum scale. Since larger-scale entities have time-dependent conditions of existence, and given that the Theory of Relativity is already established, we cannot claim that any entity's unique temporal conditions overlap exactly with those of another. Therefore, whether any living being actually lives longer than another in real terms remains unknown. For example, we cannot definitively say that a child who passes away at 3 years old remained alive for a shorter duration than a man who lived to be 100. Because we do not know what the perception of time actually depends on.
This alone is glaringly sufficient to prove the existence of the Creator, because as I mentioned, this world is merely the frontend of a computer environment. Behind it lies a backend consisting of a vast multitude of code blocks.
Written by: Emre Pelit
Felsefi İtirazlar ve Yazarın Savunusu (Objections & Rebuttals)
Counter-Dialectical Inquiry (Fizik & Kozmoloji) — İtiraz: Can we not conclude from this that humans and other living or non-living entities are far more complex than we think?
Yazarın Yanıtı (Rebuttal): Yet, proceeding from the DeWitt equations, we can state that there is timelessness at the quantum scale. Since larger-scale entities have time-dependent conditions of existence, and given that the Theory of Relativity is already established, we cannot claim that any entity's unique temporal conditions overlap exactly with those of another. Therefore, whether any living being actually lives longer than another in real terms remains unknown. For example, we cannot definitively say that a child who passes away at 3 years old remained alive for a shorter duration than a man who lived to be 100. Because we do not know what the perception of time actually depends on.
This alone is glaringly sufficient to prove the existence of the Creator, because as I mentioned, this world is merely the frontend of a computer environment. Behind it lies a backend consisting of a vast multitude of code blocks.
Foundational Problem & Resolution (The Simulation Structure of Time and N…) — İtiraz: But has it ever occurred to you: what organ or entity actually imposes the concept of time upon us—is it our mind, a quantum particle within our neurons, or our soul?
Yazarın Yanıtı (Rebuttal): Yet, proceeding from the DeWitt equations, we can state that there is timelessness at the quantum scale. Since larger-scale entities have time-dependent conditions of existence, and given that the Theory of Relativity is already established, we cannot claim that any entity's unique temporal conditions overlap exactly with those of another. Therefore, whether any living being actually lives longer than another in real terms remains unknown. For example, we cannot definitively say that a child who passes away at 3 years old remained alive for a shorter duration than a man who lived to be 100. Because we do not know what the perception of time actually depends on. This alone is glaringly sufficient to prove the existence of the Creator, because as I mentioned, this world is merely the frontend of a computer environment. Behind it lies a backend consisting of a vast multitude of code blocks.